Seating Arrangements and Sociability in the Classroom: The Case of a Primary School in Algeria

Soumia Boudra, Youcef Lazri, Hocine Bougdah

Abstract


The research presented in this publication explores the development of social skills by primary school children. It aims to identify the possible links that may exist between the development of such skills and the architectural design of the classrooms, and how classroom architectural design can promote the acquisition of social skills and sociability among primary school pupils in Algeria. A mixed research method of survey and in-situ observation was used with a sample of 100 children aged 6 to 11 years, attending a primary school in the province of SKIKDA, ALGERIA. First an in-person survey conducted among the school children, to seek their responses to a number of quantitative and qualitative questions. In the second part of the research, the seating layout in classrooms was changed from the usual arrangement of rows, and the children’s behavioural change in response to the changes was observed in a non-invasive way. As a result, the seating layout as a physical factor in the classroom has a major influence on children's acquisition of social skills. The seating arrangement of the classroom in a Circular or U-shaped seating layout, which has its origins in the KOUTTAB, has been found to be favourable for better interaction and creates a healthy environment for socializing, while varying the positions remains the best strategy.

Keywords: child, sociability, classroom interactions, seating layout

© 2025 Serbian Geographical Society, Belgrade, Serbia.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Serbia.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Australian Early Development Census. (2021). Findings from the AEDC. Australian Early Development Census. https://www.aedc.gov.au/early-childhood/findings-from-the-aedc

Aziz, N. F., & Said, I. (2012). The trends and influential factors of children’s use of outdoor environments: A review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 38, 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.341

Bennacer, H. (2005). Le climat social de la classe et son évaluation au collège. L’Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 40(34/4), 461–478. https://doi.org/10.4000/osp.409

Bergin, C., & Bergin, D. (2009). Attachment in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 21(2), 141–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9104-0

Bosacki, S. (2022). Education research on developmental social cognition in children and adolescence. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-169

Ezzat Hassan, A., & Salah Noaman, S. (2022). The role of classrooms interior design in creating a creativity supportive environment in the shade of the new education philosophy introduction. Journal of Architecture, Arts and Humanistic Sciences, 7(31), 689–713. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361400149

Falout, J. (2014). Circular seating arrangements: Approaching the social crux in language classrooms. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.2.6

Feng, S., Tan, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhang, Q. (2024). Spatial structure of peer networks and academic achievement based on a random control trial experiment. China & World Economy, 32(3), 67–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12532

Ferguson, K. T., Cassells, R. C., MacAllister, J. W., & Evans, G. W. (2013). The physical environment and child development: An international review. International Journal of Psychology, 48(4), 437–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2013.804190

Gao, N., Rahaman, M. S., Shao, W., Ji, K., & Salim, F. D. (2022). Individual and group-wise classroom seating experience. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 6(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3550335

Gremmen, M. C., van den Berg, Y., Steglich, C., Veenstra, R., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2018). The importance of near-seated peers for elementary students' academic engagement and achievement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 57, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.04.004

Hausfather, S. J. (1996). Vygotsky and schooling: Creating a social context for learning. Action in Teacher Education, 18(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.1996.10462828

Hilal, Ü. S. (2015). Effects of different seating arrangements on learning experience: The case of medium sized lecture settings in Bilkent University [Master’s thesis, Bilkent University].

Ivanova, N., & Vinogradova, M. (2019). Correlation between leadership and sociometric status of a pre-school child in a group of peers. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social, Economic, and Academic Leadership (ICSEAL 2019) (Vol. 3, No. 4). https://doi.org/10.2991/icseal-19.2019.47

Jensen, R. (2015). Running head: Socratic method in critical thinking skills. Faculty of Grace University.

Kaya, N., & Burgess, B. (2007). Territoriality. Environment & Behavior, 39(6), 859–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506298798

Lakha, S. (2023). Understanding Classroom Layout and Design. EducaSciences. https://www.educasciences.org/learning-environment-design-classroom-layout-and-design

Mahmoud, H.-T. H. (2017). Interior Architectural Elements that Affect Human Psychol-ogy and Behavior. The Academic Research Community Publication, 1(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.21625/archive.v1i1.112

McCabe, E. M., & Best, N. C. (2022). The Significance of Social Development Support in Schools: The Critical Role of School Nurses. NASN School Nurse, 38(2), Article 1942602X2211282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942602x221128227

Million, A., Schamun, K., & Fegter, S. (2024). Understanding Well-Being Through Chil-dren’s Eyes: Lessons for Shaping the Built Environment. Urban Planning, 9(9), Ar-ticle 8618. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.8618

Monsalve Lorente, L. (2013). La educación para la salud en la escuela como inter-vención social / Health Education at School as Social Intervention. Revista Inter-nacional de Ciencias Sociales, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.37467/gka-revsocial.v2.1225

Pakpahan, F. H., & Saragih, M. (2022). Theory of Cognitive Development by Jean Pia-get. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.52622/joal.v2i2.79

Pham, B., Le, T., & Duong, H. (2025). Participation Level in Different Seating Zones and Experiences with Row-and-column Arrangement in EFL Speaking Class. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v3i1.493

Rabindran, & Madanagopal, D. (2020). Piaget’s theory and stages of cognitive devel-opment - an overview. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences, 8(9), 2152–2157. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2020.v08i09.034

Ralph, M., Schneider, B., Benson, D. R., Ward, D., & Vartia, A. (2022). Student Enroll-ment Decisions and Academic Success: Evaluating the Impact of Classroom Space Design. Learning Environments Research, 25(2), 523–547. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1338357

Rands, M., & Gansemer-Topf, A. (2017). The Room Itself Is Active: How Classroom Design Impacts Student Engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1), 26–33.

Reyero, D., & Gil Cantero, F. (2019). La educación que limita es la que libera. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 77(273). https://doi.org/10.22550/rep77-2-2019-01

Sivanathan, I., Thamburaj, K. P., Ponniah, K., Arumugum, L., & Rajamani, R. (2024). Transforming classroom dynamics: A comparative analysis of U-style, V-style, and circle innovative teaching techniques. International Journal of Advanced and Ap-plied Sciences, 11(10), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.10.012

Sternad, D. (2011). Cultural influences on the adaptation process. In D. Sternad (Ed.), Strategic Adaptation (pp. 139-158). Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0455-2_6

Tulviste, T., Best, D.L., & Gibbons, J.L. (2019). Children’s Culturally Enriched Social Development. In Tulviste, T., Best, D., Gibbons, J. (Eds.), Children’s Social Worlds in Cultural Context (pp. 233-239). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27033-9_17

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological pro-cesses. Harvard University Press.

Wannarka, R., & Ruhl, K. (2008). Seating arrangements that promote positive academ-ic and behavioural outcomes: a review of empirical research. Support for Learning, 23(2), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9604.2008.00375.x

Wardani, H. K. (2022). Pemikiran Teori Kognitif Piaget di Sekolah Dasar. Khazanah Pendidikan, 16(1), 7–7. https://doi.org/10.30595/jkp.v16i1.12251

Whipple, S. S., & Evans, G. W. (2022). The physical environment and social develop-ment. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of child-hood social development (pp. 171–188). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119679028.ch9

Zimmermann, P., Stallings, L., Pierce, R., & Largent, D. (2018). Classroom Interaction Redefined: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Moving Beyond Traditional Class-room Spaces to Promote Student Engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces, 7(1), 45-61.

Zukorlić, M. S., & Nikolić, I. A. (2022). School as an educational context for the devel-opment of students’ social competence. Sociološki Pregled, 56(3), 954–977. https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg56-39517


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.